Kuehl’s Healthcare Bill, SB 840, Passes California Assembly

–via PNHP


On Monday, August 28th, Senate Bill 840, authored by State Senator Sheila Kuehl (D-23), passed out of the California State Assembly on a preliminary vote of 43-30 (final vote expected to be 44-31).

SB 840 provides a concrete plan for covering every California resident with comprehensive health insurance, saves the state of California, businesses and working families nearly $8 billion in the first year, and guarantees our right to choose our own doctor. The bill will now return to the State Senate for concurrence and is expected to reach the Governor’s desk by September 1st.

SB 840 provides comprehensive medical, dental, vision, hospitalization and prescription drug coverage to every California resident. This broad coverage is made possible through a streamlined claims and reimbursement system that is projected to save billions of dollars in administrative costs. SB 840 allows California to use its purchasing power to negotiate bulk rates for prescription drugs and durable medical equipment, such as wheelchairs, thus realizing an additional $2 billion in savings, SB 840 preserves the status of healthcare providers, hospitals and pharmacies as private, competitive businesses.

The plan is funded by drawing in current public spending and replacing all premiums, co-pays and deductibles paid to insurance companies with premiums paid to the system. As amended, the bill creates a blue ribbon panel of health, finance and technical experts to lay out the mechanics for an affordable premium structure using information gathered in available funding studies.

“The growing cost of health insurance is bankrupting our businesses and working families. Our health care system is being decimated to pay for insurance company waste”, says State Senator Kuehl. “SB 840 is the right solution for California’s broken health care system. It covers everyone, it contains costs and it improves quality – most important, it guarantees your right to choose your own doctor.”

“This plan provides security and savings to every California family, helps businesses by reducing their health insurance costs, and saves the state almost a billion dollars”, said Speaker Fabian Nunez. “The Governor should sign this historic bill.”

“Right now we have a broken system that leaves too many Californians in medical or financial jeopardy and a system that hinders economic growth”, said President Pro Tem Senator Don Perata. “SB 840 is responsible, it’s achievable and it’s what we need to do to fix the health care system in California.”

(Comment by Don McCanne: SB 840 has already been passed by the California State Senate. It will return there for concurrence in an amendment calling for a commission to establish the mechanics of a premium structure, and then will move on to Gov. Schwarzenegger’s desk.)

Link to Original Article

Medicare Ads Paid by Drug Industry

–via The Guardian

Friday August 25, 2006


AP Special Correspondent

WASHINGTON (AP) – The pharmaceutical industry quietly footed the bill for at least part of a recent multimillion-dollar ad campaign praising lawmakers who support the new Medicare prescription drug benefit, according to political officials.

The U.S. Chamber of Commerce claims credit for the ads, although a spokesman refused repeatedly to say whether it had received any funds from the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America.

Several campaign strategists not involved in the ad campaign said no legal issues were raised by the pharmaceutical industry’s involvement. In political terms, though, the disclosure is likely to embolden Democratic critics of the Medicare drug program, who charge it amounts to a Republican-engineered windfall for drug companies.

The commercials, airing in 10 states or congressional districts, generally say the local congressman or senator supports the drug program, and that hundreds of thousands of Medicare beneficiaries have saved money since its inception earlier this year.

Link to Original Article

Two Connecticut Democratic Candidates: Both Favor Universal Health Care

–via the New Haven Independent

Malloy, DeStefano Battle Over Universal Health Care

by Melinda Tuhus

August 7, 2006

They both want it. The question: How to pay for it? As the “other” Democratic primary race in Connecticut heads to the finish line Aug. 8 – the one that’s not Lieberman v. Lamont, but Dan Malloy v. John DeStefano for the Democratic nomination for governor – the focus on the candidates’ dueling plans for universal health coverage has moved front and center.

Malloy’s camp aired a commercial in early August showing DeStefano’s head on the body of a pregnant woman and a mother holding a baby to challenge his commitment to women’s health issues. (While some called the ad clever, it may have backfired, as many women protested that it was in poor taste, and it can’t be found on Malloy’s own website.) Then, over the weekend, some supporters from each camp picketed the other candidate’s headquarters over the issue.

The Universal Health Care Foundation of Connecticut is happy with both plans, says foundation president Juan Figueroa, knowing that whoever wins the primary will carry the issue forward to the general election and to Gov. Jodi Rell. Rell so far has not said much at all about what both Democrats call Connecticut’s health care crisis, and who has not yet presented her own plan.

The foundation’s position is that any viable plan for universal health care must be affordable, portable, provide access for all, and be economically sustainable by society. Figueroa says both plans meet these criteria, at least potentially (because they are concepts, not plans that have been operationalized). “The difference is in how they are financed,” says Figueroa.

But as the race tightens to practically a dead heat and heads down to the wire, both campaigns are drawing all kinds of distinctions between their plans. Below are summaries of each plan, and critiques by each side of the other’s plan. (Full descriptions can be found here and here.)

Link to Original Article

San Francisco’s Universal Health Care Program Becomes Law

— via KCBS

Monday, 07 August 2006

San Francisco, Calif. (KCBS) — San Francisco’s mayor today signed into law the city’s Universal Health Access plan, but it is a long way from being fully implemented.

KCBS reporter Barbara Taylor at the City Hall Bureau explains the plan is complex with pricing and coverage details still to be worked out. But the idea is to offer some sort of comprehensive health care to the city’s uninsured at a low cost.

Mayor Gavin Newsom, in signing the legislation, said it could take up to three years to get the plan working. “We’ve got a lot of work to do. It’s an exciting time. We’ve obviously, I think, changed the dialog in the state,” he said.

Nothing could cap the enthusiasm of Supervisor Tom Ammiano. “The Italians have a word “stupendo,” and this is stupendous,” he said.

The proposal is to begin offering health coverage in one year to about 15,000 participants. Others will be added as money and space become available.

Participants will pay up to $200 a month, depending on their income, plus undetermined co-payments for doctor visits and prescriptions.

Link to Original Article

Crucial Day in Sacramento: Assembly Votes on Universal Health Care

— via the California Progress Report

By Frank Russo

Senate Bill 840 by Senator Sheila Kuehl, a historic universal health care, single payer system proposal, will be voted on by the Assembly. A last minute press conference by Fabian Nunez, the Speaker of the Assembly and Senate President pro Tem Don Perata along with Senator Kuehl and others is scheduled for 10 a.m. to give it an extra push. It would cover all California residents for a comprehensive range of medical costs, including dental care, prescriptions, mental health care and hospitalization and give patients the right to choose their own doctor.

It has the support of over 475 organizations as well as 15 cities, including Los Angeles, San Francisco, and Oakland. It has drawn heavy opposition from the California Chamber of Commerce and other powerful interests in the state. It should pass the Assembly on what may be a narrow vote and have clearer sailing in the State Senate where it was approved 25 to 15 in May. If it is any indication of what is to come, the Assembly defeated by a 46 to 28 vote margin an attempt by Republican Assemblymember Aghazarian to put hostile amendments into the bill on Thursday.

Senator Kuehl and others are already looking ahead to what may be the biggest obstacle of all—getting Governor Schwarzenegger to sign the bill. There is a rally scheduled for Wednesday in the Capitol to tell the Governor to “do the right thing” and sign this bill into law. Most observers expect a veto. If it does become law, it would California would be a leader in the nation for what may become a single payer plan for the nation, cutting out much of the 25% or more that is taken by insurance carriers and the expensive paperwork that medical providers must process.

Link to Original Article

Kentuckians hold Citizens’ Hearing on Health Care Crisis

Hearing on Health Care Crisis

The crisis is rooted in the current for-profit financing of health care. There is a solution. It is comprehensive reform based on non-profit, public financing with private delivery of health services.–Garrett Adams, MD, MPH, Hearing Moderator

In everybody’s family, there’s a testimonial like those we heard today . . . what’s happening now is breaking people’s lives.-The Hon. Gerald A. Neal, Kentucky State Senator

If anyone isn’t angry about this, they just aren’t listening! -Gerry C., small business owner

Her out-of-pocket expenses were 77 percent of her gross income–and she had insurance!-Edgar Lopez, MD, commenting on a neighbor’s experience

As chair of the Health and Human Services Committee, I represent the uninsured and the underinsured in our community-Mary Woolridge, Metro Louisville Councilwoman

On this issue, I believe the people are out in front of the politicians. -John Yarmuth, Congressional candidate, KY -3rd district

Co-pays are higher, coverage is decreasing–soon we will all be among the have-nots.

–J. Wayne Crabtree, Louisville Metro Health Department

The so-called “ownership society” talk is just a smokescreen. The health care supply side-the insurance companies and drug companies-they own the system and control policy.

–Mark McKinley, testifying on behalf of a friend burdened with medical debt

I thought this would be primarily an urban issue, but I was amazed at the groundswell in the rural areas.-The Hon. Joni L. Jenkins, State Representative, sponsor of a Kentucky resolution urging Congress to enact HR 676

At a certain point I noticed the hushed attentiveness of the audience, the unique bonding among everyone there.-Mary Ann Garnar, on the impact of the testimonials

We will pay for health care the way we pay for all the things we think important-our justice system, our roads, our common needs-Ewell Scott, MD, featured speaker

On Saturday morning, June 10, an estimated 140 people joined elected representatives, public health officials, and health care providers at Calvary Episcopal Church in downtown Louisville to hear the testimonials of individuals who understand the real costs of our national health care “meltdown.”

Representing diverse interests–the uninsured, the underinsured,small business owners, those coping with the increasing costs of premiums and/or medication, and those burdened by medical debt-the testifiers told their stories, hoping to move both the public and public officials to take immediate action.

The two-hour event, billed as a “Citizens’ Congressional Hearing on the Health Care Crisis,” was sponsored by Kentuckians for Single Payer Health Care (KSPH) and the Kentucky Chapter of Physicians for a National Health Program (PNHP-KY). Co-sponsors included 33 labor and social justice organizations (listed below).

The forum was one of 70 such hearings being held across the country, and one of many special events scheduled during the week of 6/7/06, a week of national action called by Healthcare-NOW.org in support of HR 676, the United States National Health Insurance Act, the single payer plan proposed by Congressman John Conyers.

Congressional candidate John Yarmuth, whose platform includes single payer, joined State Senator Gerald Neal, State Representative Joni Jenkins, Louisville Metro Councilwoman Mary Woolridge, and Metro Health Department official Wayne Crabtree, on the hearing panel.

Congresswoman Anne Northup was invited, but she responded through staff that she would be unable to attend.

Kentucky House members Darryl Owens and Jim Wayne were in the audience, and several state lawmakers–from both sides of the aisle–sent messages of support for the event.

Each testimonial addressed a different facet of our broken health care system. Gerry C., owner of a small business, had tracked the percentage rise in the employer’s share of premium costs over the past few years, finally admitting that he could no longer cover his employees and stay in business. “If anyone isn’t angry about this, they just aren’t listening,” he concluded.

Paula V. spoke tearfully of her husband’s need for a liver transplant. The family, including two young children, has been caught in a bureaucratic nightmare, asked to meet competing criteria for disability benefits, the wife’s employer-based insurance, and Passport/Medicaid. Through it all, a very sick young man has been asked to jump through multiple financial and therapeutic hoops.

Michele F., a self-employed widow in her mid-forties, was paying $2000 annually for a catastrophic plan when, last summer, the catastrophe occurred. Michele suffered a stroke, spent three days in the hospital and is now trying to pay off $7,000 in out-of pocket expenses. Currently, she has a family policy with a $20,000 deductible and prays her children don’t get ill.

Carrie I., a young mother who has asthma and high blood pressure, spoke of having remained in a very unpleasant job because she feared losing her health coverage. Although she now has a better work situation, health care expenses absorb one third of her salary. She admits to skimping on her own medication, and must often renegotiate with her insurer to make certain her children are covered.

An uninsured home health aide, Francene S., age 51, told of her struggles to get specialized care after her heart attack. She worries what will happen if the stents in her heart need to be replaced. She works and has tried to get insurance but the $2000 to $3000 monthly premiums quoted are far beyond her ability to pay.

Mark McKinley relayed the story of his friend, Penny K, injured in a kayaking accident. Penny had been paying $290 a month for what she thought was adequate health insurance. She received excellent medical care for severe back and neck trauma, but she has been left with a debt of $11,000 for uncovered expenses. “The so-called ‘ownership society’talk is just a smokescreen,” Mr. McKinley remarked. “The health care supply side – the insurance companies and drug companies – they own the system and control policy. We get stiffed and just own more debt. It’s time to say ‘no’ to the status quo!”

Speaking for the Jefferson County Teachers’ Association (JCTA) and Jobs with Justice, Ann Walsh recalled that health care was the major issue in the teachers’ recent round of negotiations with the State. She expects it to come up again. She decried the “greed of the health insurance industry” as costs are increasingly being shifted to the worker.

The Reverend A. David Bos reminded attendees of the accumulating wealth and political power of the health care and pharmaceutical industries. Public monies that should be used to fight disease and environmental harms are being funneled instead to the profit-making health care “juggernaut.”

Dr. Edgar Lopez, a member of PNHP-KY, wore black armbands in memory of the estimated 18,000 who die each year for lack of access to care. Waving invoices as proof of the out-of-pocket costs paid by a neighbor who suffered from a chronic illness, Lopez exclaimed, “Her out-of-pocket expenses were 77 percent of her gross income– and she had insurance!”

Reflecting on the combined impact of the testimonials, KSPH member Mary Ann Garnar said, “At a certain point I noticed the hushed attentiveness of the audience, the unique bonding among everyone there.”

The featured speaker, Dr. Ewell Scott, an internist from Morehead, KY and also a PNHP member, outlined “the single payer solution.” He explained how a national nonprofit health insurance system would work,and why attempts at short-term fixes will not. “Reducing the number of health insurance companies in the US from an estimated 2,000 to one will save us 400 billion dollars a year,” he exclaimed. “No one disputes these figures.”

To those who would ask how the system would be financed, Dr. Scott offered this response: “We will pay for health care the way we pay for all the things we think important-our justice system, our roads, our common needs.”

The savings generated by the administrative efficiency of single payer, combined with the public dollars already in our system, would provide enough funds to cover everyone in the US. If supplemental financing is necessary, HR 676 proposes minimal taxes. “There will be no premiums, no co-pays,” Dr. Scott reminded his listeners, adding that any required taxes would be levied equitably: “Each of us will participate to the degree that we are able.”

“My plea is to spread the word,” Dr. Scott concluded. “Talk to your representatives about single payer. Tell them ‘It’s easy, but you’ve got to have the guts to do it!'”

Members of the hearing panel were asked to give a brief response. They thanked the testifiers for their courage in speaking out, and they pledged to redouble efforts in support of health care for all.

“In everybody’s family, there’s a testimonial like those we heard today,” observed Senator Neal. “That means there’s an army out there waiting to be organized, to be focused [on reform] . . . what’s happening now is breaking people’s lives.”

The Senator promised to support a state endorsement of HR 676, but he believes true reform must be implemented at the federal level. He urged the hearing organizers to continue efforts to raise public awareness, to educate their representatives on the merits of single-payer. Referring to the challenging task ahead, the Senator spoke bluntly: “The insurance companies are well organized and well funded. Only sustained activity by motivated volunteers can counteract the power of that ‘paid army.'”

J. Wayne Crabtree brought greetings from the Director of the Louisville Metro Health Department, Dr. Adewale Troutman who has researched the more equitable delivery of health care in countries having single-payer systems.

Public health officials view health care from a disease prevention perspective, said Mr. Crabtree. “As we have seen with HIV-AIDS and other infectious diseases, sickness can quickly spread throughout the world.”

Moving the argument for reform to the local level, Crabtree reported that an estimated 12 percent of Kentuckians are uninsured.”These individuals have names, faces, and families.” Even the insured cannot be complacent: “Co-pays are higher, coverage is decreasing–soon we will all be among the have-nots.”

“Health care for all is long overdue,” exclaimed Councilwoman Woolridge, pledging to work towards passage of a Metro Council resolution in support of HR 676. She invited area residents to sign up to speak at local Council meetings. “As Chair of the Health and Human Services Committee,” she pointed out, “I represent the uninsured and the underinsured in our community.” She closed with a quote from Dr.Martin Luther King, Jr., noting that his words are still relevant today: “Of all the forms of inequality, injustice in health care is the most shocking and inhumane.”

Candidate Yarmuth urged voters to boldly confront candidates on health care, to track campaign donations from the health care industry, and to vote for those who support a national single payer system. Facing an incumbent well-funded by the for-profit health care sector, he acknowledged that it is not easy “to discuss a complex issue like health care reform in sound bites.” Mr. Yarmuth is, however, encouraged by the fact that “on this issue, I believe the people are out in front of the politicians.”

Rep. Joni Jenkins recalled her work as sponsor of HCR 40 (a State resolution calling on Congress to enact the Conyers bill) during the recent Kentucky legislative session.” I thought this would be primarily an urban issue, but I was amazed at the groundswell in the rural areas. Several colleagues, Republicans as well as Democrats, came to me and said, ‘I need to sign on to this. I am hearing about this back home.'” The resolution went to the House floor with bipartisan support but the bill was not ultimately called for a vote.

“Don’t worry–we’ll be back in Frankfort for the next session,” said KSPH Coordinator Kay Tillow, issuing an urgent call for grassroots action. Ms. Tillow has been successful in gaining endorsements for HR676 from labor organizations around the country.

Dr. Garrett Adams, coordinator of PNHP-KY, explained the rationale for holding such a public hearing: “It is clear that we have a very serious health crisis in this country caused by a gradual change of health care delivery from a human service, a social good, to a market-driven industry. The crisis is rooted in the current for-profit financing of health care. As Dr. Scott has said, there is a solution. It is comprehensive reform based on non-profit, public financing with private delivery of health services. The United States Health Insurance Act, HR 676 will accomplish this true reform. Our people deserve to see this bill enacted.”

Hearing co-sponsors: AFSCME Local 2629, Amalgamated Transit Union Local 1447, Citizens Against Police Abuse, Coalition for the People’s Agenda, Crescent Hill Presbyterian Church, Fairness Campaign, Fellowship of Reconciliation, Graphic Communications Union Local 619-M, Greater Louisville Central Labor Council, Interfaith Paths to Peace,Jefferson County Chapter Kentuckians for the Commonwealth, Jefferson County Teachers Association, Justice Resource Center, KY AFL-CIO, KY Alliance Against Racist & Political Repression, KY Coalition Against the Death Penalty, KY Interfaith Task Force onLatin America & the Caribbean, KY Jobs with Justice, KY Nurses Association, Laborers’ International Union Local 576, Louisville Branch of the NAACP, Louisville Peace Action Community, Louisvillians in Favor of Equality, Metropolitan Housing Coalition, National Writers Union-UAW1981, Nurses Professional Organization, Pro-Se Plaintiffs &Litigants Association, Social Concerns Committee–First Unitarian Church, Teamsters Local 89, UAW Local 862, University of Louisville Peace and Justice Committee, Western KY Area Council AFL-CIO, Women in Transition

Submitted by Harriette Seiler, hearing coordinator.

Health Care Coverage in the Courier-Journal

The current state of America’s health care system has received some coverage recently in the Louisville Courier-Journal.

On January 30th, The Louisville Courier-Journal published an article by Laura Ungur entitled ‘Support swells for universal health care’. Here’s an excerpt:

A possible groundswell

A 2002 report by the Institute of Medicine, which advises the federal government on health issues, said 18,000 adults die each year because they lack health insurance. Overall, the United States has a lower life expectancy than several countries, including Canada and the United Kingdom, that have national systems.

“The health-care system is in a deepening crisis,” said Dr. Steffie Woolhandler, an associate professor of medicine at Harvard University and co-founder of Physicians for a National Health Program. “The public is quite fed up.”

There are signs that the idea of a national system has increasing support here:

A poll last year by the Pew Research Center found that 65 percent of Americans favor national health insurance, even if it means higher taxes.

Read the whole article here.

On February 17th, The Courier-Journal also published an editorial letter by Dr. Garrett Adams, Kentucky Coordinator for Physicians for a National Health Program, entitled ‘Health care: the single payer vision’. You can read the editorial in full either on the Courier-Journal’s site or on our Voices page.